What does the phrase “treat others how you want to be treated”? – “Treat others the way you want to be treated yourself.” This phrase is a moral principle. That if you don’t want to feel disrespected, you shouldn’t disrespect people. If you want to be treated with respect, treat others with respect.
- If you act on jealousy and anger, you will definitely get it back.
- Actually in society, if you treat others nicely you will definitely find nicer responses from them.
- So you should treat others in good manners such as affection, value, and kindness.
- But it is not like we will always get back from people what we gave them.
You should never give others a bad feeling about themselves If you don’t want to have the same feelings. So try to overcome pride and ego and don’t let others make you feel bad about yourself. If you want mercy, show mercy. Do what’s right! and do the best you can do to treat others so be humble and do not think of yourself very much better than others.
- This attitude helps you to treat others with dignity and kindness.
- So try to be kind to the people you meet throughout the day.
- These may be friends, acquaintances, colleagues, and even those who are not kind to you.
- When we value the needs and consider what we can do to serve others, then we will be on a great way to experience God’s best blessings for our lives.
Mostly If you start treating the people around you with love, kindness, and respect, you’ll surprise how much they will treat you.
What is it called when you treat others the way they treat you?
Summary and conclusions –
The golden rule is a moral principle which denotes that you should treat others the way you want to be treated yourself.For example, the golden rule means that if you want people to treat you with respect, then you should treat them with respect too.The underlying concept behind the golden rule has been formulated by various individuals and groups throughout history, and it’s often seen as one of the key principles which are used to guide how people should behave toward each other.A notable limitation of the golden rule is the fact that others might not want to be treated the same way you want to be treated; this issue can be addressed by refining the golden rule into a variant called the platinum rule, which suggests that we should treat others the way they themself wish to be treated.When implementing the golden rule, it’s important to keep in mind that it’s meant to serve as a general rule of thumb rather than an absolute law, and there are situations where other guiding principles overrule it.
Should you treat people the way they treat you?
The Golden Rule is the principle of treating others as you want to be treated. It is a maxim that is found in many religions and cultures. It can be considered an ethic of reciprocity in some religions, although other religions treat it differently.
Why is it important to treat others the way you want to be treated?
Why is it important? – The importance of providing the same treatment we’d want is that it allows everyone to be treated well. People who do bad things to people have often had bad things done to them. Through those bad things, they feel no desire to be good to anyone except themselves.
People can have a hard time being respectful when they aren’t respected. People can not care to be kind when they haven’t been given kindness. There’s a psychological principle known as the law of reciprocity. It’s the idea that when we do nice things for people, they’re more likely to do nice things for us.
In fact, some research has shown that reciprocity can influence people to do even kinder acts in return than the one initially given. By keeping this idea of how we treat people in mind, a lot of good changes could potentially happen. But it all starts with us.
Why do people treat you badly?
2. Address your issues – Having low self-esteem is one of the most common reasons why many people allow their partners to treat them badly. Childhood trauma, a false belief of how relationships work, and even a mindset that your partner will still change are all reasons why you are not doing anything about your situation. It’s true that how they treat you is how they feel about you, but it’s equally valid that how people treat you is also a reflection of what you feel about yourself. If you don’t respect yourself to walk away or do something about the situation, this will continue. Also Try: Do I Treat My Boyfriend Badly Quiz
What causes people to treat others badly?
Why some people are cruel to others Inflicting harm or pain on someone incapable of doing the same to you might seem intolerably cruel, but it happens more than you might think. Why are some humans cruel to people who don’t pose a threat to them – sometimes even their own children? Where does this behaviour come from and what purpose does it serve? – Ruth, 45, London. Humans are the glory and the scum of the universe, concluded the French philosopher, Blaise Pascal, in 1658.
- Little has changed.
- We love and we loathe.
- We help and we harm.
- We reach out a hand and we stick in the knife.
- We understand if someone lashes out in retaliation or self-defence.
- But when someone harms the harmless, we ask: “How could you?” Humans typically do things to get pleasure or avoid pain.
- For most of us, hurting others causes us to feel their pain.
And we don’t like this feeling. This suggests two reasons people may harm the harmless – either they don’t feel the others’ pain or they enjoy feeling the others’ pain. Another reason people harm the harmless is because they nonetheless see a threat. Someone who doesn’t imperil your body or wallet can still threaten your social status.
This helps explain otherwise puzzling actions, such as when people harm others who help them financially. Liberal societies assume causing others to suffer means we have harmed them, Yet some philosophers reject this idea, In the 21st Century, can we still conceive of being cruel to be kind? Sadists and psychopaths Someone who gets pleasure from hurting or humiliating others is a sadist.
Sadists feel other people’s pain more than is normal. And they enjoy it, At least, they do until it is over, when they may feel bad, The popular imagination associates sadism with torturers and murderers. Yet there is also the less extreme, but more widespread, phenomenon of everyday sadism, Most people would flinch from having to torture another human being, mainly because when we inflict harm on others, we share some of that pain (Credit: Alamy) Thankfully, most people have no psychopathic traits, Only 0.5% of people could be deemed psychopaths.
- Yet around 8% of male and 2% of female prisoners are psychopaths.
- But not all psychopaths are dangerous.
- Anti-social psychopaths may seek thrills from drugs or dangerous activities.
- Prosocial psychopaths, on the other hand, seek their thrills in the fearless pursuit of novel ideas.
- As innovations shape our societies, prosocial psychopaths can change the world for all of us.
Yet this still can be for both good and for ill. Where do these traits come from? No one really knows why some people are sadistic. Some speculate that sadism is an adaptation that helped us slaughter animals when hunting, Others propose it helped people to gain power.
- Italian philosopher and diplomat Niccolò Machiavelli once suggested that “the times, not men, create disorder”.
- Consistent with this, neuroscience suggests sadism could be a survival tactic triggered by times becoming tough.
- When certain foods become scarce, our levels of the neurotransmitter, serotonin, fall,
This fall makes us more willing to harm others because harming becomes more pleasurable, There are more mild forms of sadism that allow people to get a cheap thrill from someone in a vulnerable position (Credit: Alamy) Psychopathy may also be an adaptation, Some studies have linked higher levels of psychopathy to greater fertility, Yet others have found the opposite,
- The reason for this may be that psychopaths have a reproductive advantage specifically in harsh environments,
- Indeed, psychopathy can thrive in unstable, competitive worlds.
- Psychopaths’ abilities make them master manipulators.
- Their impulsivity and lack of fear help them take risks and grab short-term gains.
In the film Wall Street, the psychopathic Gordon Gekko makes millions, Yet although psychopathy may be an advantage in the corporate world, it only offers men a slim leadership edge, Psychopathy’s link to creativity may also explain its survival. The mathematician Eric Weinstein argues, more generally, that disagreeable people drive innovation,
- Yet, if your environment supports creative thinking, disagreeableness is less strongly linked to creativity,
- The nice can be novel.
- Sadism and psychopathy are associated with other traits, such as narcissism and Machiavellianism,
- Such traits, taken together, are called the ” dark factor of personality ” or D-factor for short.
There is a moderate to large hereditary component to these traits. So some people may just be born this way. Alternatively, high D-factor parents could pass these traits onto their children by behaving abusively towards them. Similarly, seeing others behave in high D-factor ways may teach us to act this way.
We all have a role to play in reducing cruelty. Fear and dehumanisation Sadism involves enjoying another person’s humiliation and hurt. Yet it is often said that dehumanising people is what allows us to be cruel. Potential victims are labelled as dogs, lice or cockroaches, allegedly making it easier for others to hurt them.
There is something to this. Research shows that if someone breaks a social norm, our brains treat their faces as less human, This makes it easier for us to punish people who violate norms of behaviour. It is a sweet sentiment to think that if we see someone as human then we won’t hurt them. The Nazis dehumanised and murdered millions of people during the Holocaust at concentration camps (Credit: Reuters) For example, the Nazi Party dehumanised Jewish people by calling them vermin and lice, Yet the Nazis also humiliated, tortured and murdered Jews precisely because they saw them as humans who would be degraded and suffer from such treatment.
- Do-gooder derogation Sometimes people will even harm the helpful.
- Imagine you are playing an economic game in which you and other players have the chance to invest in a group fund.
- The more money is paid into it, the more it pays out.
- And the fund will pay out money to all players, whether they have invested or not.
At the end of the game, you can pay to punish other players for how much they chose to invest. To do so, you give up some of your earnings and money is taken away from the player of your choice. In short, you can be spiteful, Some players chose to punish others who invested little or nothing in the group fund.
Yet some will pay to punish players who invested more in the group fund than they did. Such acts seem to make no sense. Generous players give you a greater pay-out – why would you dissuade them? This phenomenon is called “do-gooder derogation”. It can be found around the world. In hunter-gatherer societies, successful hunters are criticised for catching a big animal even though their catch means everyone gets more meat.
Hillary Clinton may have suffered do-gooder derogation as a result of her rights-based 2016 US Presidential Election campaign. Do-gooder derogation exists because of our counter-dominant tendencies, A less generous player in the economic game above may feel that a more generous player will be seen by others as a preferable collaborator,
The more generous person is threatening to become dominant. As the French writer Voltaire put it, the best is the enemy of the good. Yet there is a hidden upside of do-gooder derogation. Once we have pulled down the do-gooder, we are more open to their message, One study found that allowing people to express a dislike of vegetarians led them to become less supportive of eating meat,
Shooting, crucifying or failing to elect the messenger may encourage their message to be accepted. Cruel to be kind In the film Whiplash, a music teacher uses cruelty to encourage greatness in one of his students. We may recoil at such tactics. Yet the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche thought we had become too averse to such cruelty, Human history is marred with violence and cruelty against those who don’t pose a threat (Credit: Alamy) For Nietzsche, cruelty allowed a teacher to burn a critique into another, for the other person’s own good. People could also be cruel to themselves to help become the person they wanted to be.
- Nietzsche felt suffering cruelty could help develop courage, endurance and creativity.
- Should we be more willing to make both others and ourselves suffer to develop virtue? Arguably not.
- We now know the potentially appalling long-term effects of suffering cruelty from others, including damage to both physical and mental health,
The benefits of being compassionate towards oneself, rather than treating oneself cruelly, are also increasingly recognised. And the idea that we must suffer to grow is questionable. Positive life events, such as falling in love, having children and achieving cherished goals can lead to growth,
- Teaching through cruelty invites abuses of power and selfish sadism.
- It isn’t the only way – Buddhism, for example, offers an alternative: wrathful compassion,
- Here, we act from love to confront others to protect them from their greed, hatred and fear.
- Life can be cruel, truth can be cruel, but we can choose not to be.
* Simon McCarthy-Jones is an associate professor in clinical psychology and neuropsychology at Trinity College Dublin. – This article is part of Life’s Big Questions, a new series by The Conversation that is being co-published with BBC Future. It seeks to answer our readers’ nagging questions about life, love, death and the Universe.
We work with professional researchers who have dedicated their lives to uncovering new perspectives on the questions that shape our lives. If you have a question you would like to be answered, please email either send us a message on Facebook or Twitter or email [email protected] – Join one million Future fans by liking us on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter or Instagram,
If you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called “The Essential List”. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife, and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.
How others treat you is a reflection?
How other people treat us is often a reflection of their own journey. It rarely has anything to do with us. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t hurt. We’re allowed to feel that pain and acknowledge its presence.
How you are treated is more important?
‘How you are treated is more important than how much you like someone. Read that again.’
Why is it important to treat others respect?
Receiving respect from others is important because it helps us to feel safe and to express ourselves. – Being respected by important people in our lives growing up teaches us how to be respectful toward others. Respect means that you accept somebody for who they are, even when they’re different from you or you don’t agree with them.
Why should we treat others with dignity and respect?
Treat people with dignity by showing respect even if you disagree with them. Dignity: our inherent value as human beings If you treat everyone as human beings, you will have increased safety, less stress, greater work satisfaction, enhanced job performance, and improved relationships.
If you treat people with dignity, they will be more likely to cooperate with requests, not get upset, and treat you well in return. Everyone has an inherent value as a human being; however, people do not always treat each other in a way that acknowledges this. Here are some possible reasons why that happens: • We do not believe they deserve it • Our ego will not allow it • It is unnatural in the face of conflict • We do not realize it drives safety and better results • We do not know how In this article, you will learn the 5 specific methods for HOW to treat people with dignity.
The first thing to know about how to treat people with dignity is that, in order to do so, you must show them respect. This does not mean that you need to respect everyone. That would be impossible since respect is based on your personal values and must be earned.
- However, it is essential that you SHOW everyone respect.
- All people deserve to be shown respect.
- Diversity education teaches the proper way to treat people of different backgrounds, races, and genders.
- This can be challenging given the subtleties of cross-cultural expectations.
- To be effective at conflict management, you must realize how ALL people want to be treated, regardless of their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, culture, etc.
Here are the five approaches for doing this: 1. See world through their eyes 2. Listen with all senses 3. Ask and explain why 4. Offer options, let them choose 5. Give opportunity to reconsider These five approaches describe how all people want to be treated.
Everyone wants to be shown empathy, listened to, asked to do something rather than being told, provided an explanation for why they are being asked, offered options to choose from, and given an opportunity to rethink a decision. Here is a further explanation of each of the five approaches to showing people respect.1.
See World Through Their Eyes Note that this approach is listed first to highlight: • That you have implicit biases (unconscious stereotypes, hidden prejudices) • Your implicit biases will affect your actions unless consciously addressed • If not addressed, the resulting actions can result in bad outcomes Seeing the world through the eyes of others helps mitigate the impact of implicit biases, which develop over the course of a lifetime through life experiences, family biases, media, and cultural messages This approach, which means to take another person’s perspective, enables you to treat that person the way you would want to be treated if you were them and in the exact same circumstances.
- Doing this with everyone produces better outcomes.
- Example: “You must be worried about your friend,” and then pause and truly listen to what they might have to say.2.
- Listen With All Senses The most powerful way to show respect to human beings is to listen to them, which is a much different practice than just hearing them.
You hear raindrops, but to truly listen to people you must use all your senses. Listening with all senses helps evaluate other’s circumstances, emotions, thoughts, and intentions — which includes: • Seeing: proxemics (distance, positioning, hand placement) and non-verbals (body language, eye contact, expressions) • Hearing: verbals (word choice) and paraverbals (tone and volume of voice) • Smelling: hygiene, tobacco, marijuana, alcohol • Touching: level of relaxation, tension, or resistance Example: Listen to a client’s concerns about your organization, rather than just hearing his or her words while you’re trying to formulate a response in your head.3.
- Ask and Explain Why Every time you would like someone to do something, make a conscious effort to ask them to do it rather than tell them.
- Show people respect by asking a question rather than giving a command.
- Then, once you have asked, make the assumption that people can be easily confused.
- Presume the individuals with whom you interact may not understand what is going on or have any idea what will happen next.
Take the time to provide an explanation for why things are done as they are. Realize that, if you don’t explain why, the other person will likely fill in the blanks with their own reasons which could be incorrect and will probably be negative. Ask Example: “Can you please come with me?” rather than the command “Come with me!” Explain Why Example: “The reason you need to wait a few minutes is because John is stuck in traffic.” 4.
Offer Options, Let Them Choose People want to feel empowered to make their own decisions even when there are tight restrictions on their behavior. Look for ways to give people a couple of options from which to choose, rather than a single choice you have selected for them. Example: “Would you rather wait here or out in the lobby?” 5.
Give Opportunity To Reconsider People sometimes make mistakes. In the heat of the moment, they might make a rude comment or refuse a request. If there is no safety concern, allow them to save face and give them a chance to change their mind. Example: “Is there anything I can say to help you change your mind.” You may already be applying these five approaches for showing people respect in many of your interactions.
What is the number 1 Golden Rule?
1. Common Observations and Tradition – “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” This seems the most familiar version of the golden rule, highlighting its helpful and proactive gold standard. Its corollary, the so-called “silver rule,” focuses on restraint and non-harm: “do nothing to others you would not have done to you.” There is a certain legalism in the way the “do not” corollary follows its proactive “do unto” partner, in both Western and Eastern scriptural traditions.
The rule’s benevolent spirit seems protected here from being used to mask unsavory intents and projects that could be hidden beneath. (It is sobering to encounter the same positive-negative distinction, so recently introduced to handle modern moral dilemmas like abortion, thriving in 500 B.C.E.) The golden rule is closely associated with Christian ethics though its origins go further back and graces Asian culture as well.
Normally we interpret the golden rule as telling us how to act. But in practice its greater role may be psychological, alerting us to everyday self-absorption, and the failure to consider our impacts on others. The rule reminds us also that we are peers to others who deserve comparable consideration.
It suggests a general orientation toward others, an outlook for seeing our relations with them. At the least, we should not impact others negatively, treating their interests as secondary. This is a strongly egalitarian message. When first conveyed, in the inegalitarian social settings of ancient Hebrews, it could have been a very radical message.
But it likely was not, since it appears in scripture as an obscure bit of advice among scores of rules with greater point and stricture, given far more emphasis. Most likely the rule also assumed existing peer-conventions for interacting with clan-members, neighbors, co-workers, friends and siblings.
In context, the rule affirmed a sentiment like “We’re all Jews here,” or “all of sect Y.” Only when this rule was made a centerpiece of social interaction (by Jesus or Yeshua, and fellow John-the-Baptist disciples) did it become a more radical message, crossing class, clan and tribal boundaries within Judaism.
Of special note is the rule’s application to outcasts and those below one’s station—the poor, lepers, Samaritans, and certain heathens (goyem). Yeshua apparently made the rule second in importance only to the First Commandment of “the Father” (Hashem).
This was to love God committedly, then love thy neighbor as thyself, which raised the rule’s status greatly. It brought social inclusivity to center stage, thus shifting the focus of Jewish ethics generally. Yet the “love thy neighbor” maxim far exceeds the golden rule in its moral expectations. It stresses loving identification with others while the golden rule merely advises equal treatment.
Only when the golden rule was applied across various cultures did it become a truly revolutionary message. Its “good news,” spread by evangelists like Paul (Saul of Tarsus), fermented a consciousness-shift among early Christians, causing them actually to “love all of God’s children” equally, extending to the sharing of all goods and the acceptance of women as equals.
- Perhaps this was because such love and sharing radically departed from Jewish tradition and was soon replaced with standard patriarchy and private property.
- The rule’s socialism might have fermented social upheaval in occupied Roman territories had it actually been practiced on a significant scale, which may help explain its persecution in that empire.
Most likely the golden rule was not meant for such universalism, however, and cannot feasibly function on broad scales. The Confucian version of the golden rule faced a more rigid Chinese clan system, outdoing the Hebrews in social-class distinctions and the sense that many lives are worthless.
More, Confucius himself made the golden rule an unrivaled centerpiece of his philosophy of life ( The Analects, 1962). The rule, Kung-shu, came full-blown from the very lips and writings of the “morality giver” and in seemingly universal form. It played a role comparable to God’s will, in religious views, to which the concept of “heaven” or “fate” was a distant second.
And Confucius explicitly depicted the “shu” component as human-heartedness, akin to compassion. Confucian followers succeeding Mencius into the neo-Confucians, however, emphasized the Kung component or ritual righteousness. They increasingly interpreted the rule within the existing network of Chinese social conventions.
It was a source of cultural status quoism—to each social station, its proper portion. Eventually, what came to be called the Rule of the Measuring Square was associated with up to a thousand ritual directives for daily life encompassing etiquette, propriety and politeness within the array of traditional relationships and their strict role-obligations.
The social status quo in Confucian China was anything but compassionate, especially in the broader community and political arenas of life. In traditional culture, the “others” in “do unto others” was interpreted as “relevant others,” which made the rule much easier to follow, if far less egalitarian or inspiring.
- One’s true peers were identified only within one’s class, gender, or occupation, as well as one’s extended family members.
- Generalizing peer relations more broadly was unthinkable, apparently, and was therefore not read into the rule’s intent.
- Confucius spoke of hopelessly searching in vain, his whole life for one person who could practice Kung-shu for one single day.
But clearly he meant one “man,” not person, and one “gentleman” of the highest class. This classism was a source of conflict between Confucianism and Taoism, where the lowest of the low were often depicted as spiritual exemplars. For the golden rule to have become so pervasive across historical epochs and cultures suggests a growing suspicion of class and ethnic distinctions—challenging ethnocentrism.
This trend dovetails nicely with the rule’s challenge to egocentrism at the personal level. The rule’s strong and explicit egalitarianism has the same limited capture today as it did originally, confined to distinctly religious and closed communities of very limited scope. It is unclear that devout, modern-day Jews or Christians vaunt strong equality of treatment even as an ideal to strive toward.
We may speak of social outcasts in our society as comrades, and recognize members of “strange” cultures and unfriendly nations as “fellow children of God.” But we rarely place them on a par with those closer by or close to us, nor treat them especially well.
- Neither is it clear, to some, that doing so would be best.
- Instead, the rule’s original small scope and design is preserved, limited to primary groups at most.
- Biblical scholars tend to see Yeshua’s message as meant for Jews per se, extending to the treatment of non-Jews yes, but as Jews should treat them.
And this does not include treating them as Jews. The golden rule has a very different meaning when it is a circumscribed, in-group prescription. In this form, its application is guided by hosts of assumptions, expectations, traditions, and religious obligations, recognized like-mindedly by “the tribe.” This helps solve the ambiguity problem of how to apply the rule within different roles: parents dealing with children, supervisors with rank-and-file employees, and the like.
What is karma Golden Rule?
Karma and the Golden Rule / Karma and the Golden Rule 2014-09-10 ” On a daily basis, I hear young people using the term “Karma” in their conversations to express that an action that you do will come back to you in another way. That is exactly the meaning of Karma. There are many scholarly definitions of Karma, most of which are too complex for us to understand.
- But in simple terms, the conceptual principle of Karma originated from India thousand years ago.
- It is defined that good or bad actions have consequences of the same nature, or in other terms, your current circumstances have references to your past actions.
- The concept of karma encourages one to live in a morally acceptable way because eventually good actions will be rewarded with good circumstances and bad actions will be rewarded with bad circumstances.
The Golden Rule; “Do unto others, as you wish to be done unto you”, also teaches us the importance of our actions and how our characters influence others. According to the ‘golden rule’, we are not only supposed to do good because we are afraid that Karma will catch up with us but we must do good because it is the right thing to do.
- Serve others exactly the same way you would like to be served.
- Address others with respect, the same way you would like to be addressed and respected.
- All the good, according to the Golden Rule, is not to be done in fear of Karma but rather out of compassionate that makes humanity different from other creatures.
Every human being, regardless of her/his economic status, racial background, citizenship shall be treated equal. It is your duty to build respect, empathy and compassionate in your character. It is a matter of doing something good without being asked, and I assure you there is no greater feeling than seeing someone grateful for what you have done for them, without being asked.
- A noble character is not build in fear of Karma, or in order to abide to the Golden Rule, it is built out of free will.
- You have to find it in yourself to care about other people, just as much as you care about yourself.
- In our own lives, we have encountered many circumstances, some good, some are bad, some are confusing and weird, and we often are left wondering why we have to go through certain circumstances.
Life is going to have ups and downs, whether it is the effect of Karma or not. What we need to learn is how to react to and handle these circumstances. If you are going through tough times such as failing your examination or losing your job, the right thing to do is not to keep wondering what you have done badly in the past but rather how you are going to move ahead from there.
What do you call people who destroy others?
Vandal Add to list Share.
What is the word for someone who likes to hurt others?
Sadists and psychopaths – Someone who gets pleasure from hurting or humiliating others is a sadist. Sadists feel other people’s pain more than is normal. And they enjoy it, At least, they do until it is over, when they may feel bad, The popular imagination associates sadism with torturers and murderers. The everyday sadist may be an internet troll or a school bully, In online role-playing games, they are likely to be the “griefer” who spoils the game for others. Everyday sadists are drawn to violent computer games, And the more they play, the more sadistic they become,
- Unlike sadists, psychopaths don’t harm the harmless simply because they get pleasure from it (though they may ).
- Psychopaths want things.
- If harming others helps them get what they want, so be it.
- They can act this way because they are less likely to feel pity or remorse or fear,
- They can also work out what others are feeling but not get infected by such feelings themselves.
This is a seriously dangerous set of skills. Over millennia, humanity has domesticated itself, This has made it difficult for many of us to harm others. Many who harm, torture or kill will be haunted by the experience, Yet psychopathy is a powerful predictor of someone inflicting unprovoked violence. Thankfully, most people have no psychopathic traits, Only 0.5% of people could be deemed psychopaths. Yet around 8% of male and 2% of female prisoners are psychopaths. But not all psychopaths are dangerous. Anti-social psychopaths may seek thrills from drugs or dangerous activities.
What do you call a person that is controlling and disrespectful?
domineering – adjective trying to control other people and make them obey you